Librarian is maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa to maaaaaaaaaaaa the availability of works in making his determination in this proceeding. See 17 U.S.C. §1201(a)(1)(C). The House Manager's Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa calls maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa attention to "use-facilitating maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa protection measures" that copyright owners may maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, and instructs the decision maker to consider "whether on balance" the circumvention prohibition is likely to have an maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaa. House
Fifth, many submissions maaaaaaaaaaaaa the Librarian to rule, in effect, that the maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa use doctrine provides a defense to §1201(a)(1)(A), and thus that the act of circumvention of access controls should maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa any maaaaaaaaaaaaaa sanction if it is maaaaaaaaaaa to, precedes, enables, or could even in theory lead to the exercise of maaaaaaaaaa use with respect to the work thus accessed through hacking, password theft, or other unauthorized means. This argument was maaaaaaaaaaa questions and none of the questions should be seen as expressing a particular view by the panel. It's merely a way to maaaaaaaaaa more This is an ongoing proceeding and no This document is a maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa on the Maaaaaaaaaaaa Millennium Copyright Act, Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Law 105-304 (1998), maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa the new Chapter 12 to title 17 Maaaaaaaaaaa States Code, with maaaaaaaaaaaaaa attention to section 1201 provides that "No person shall maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa measure that maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa controls access to a work protected under this title." It is submitted as solicited A brief maaaaaaaaaaa of the comments maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa on the maaaaaaaaaaaaaa internet maaaaaaaaaaaaa for the maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa period, shows that most of the points I maaaaaaaaaaaa have been maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, and maaaaaaaaaaaaa well, so in the interests of clarity, I will add only two points that I maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa attention, and which maaaaaaaaaaaaaa into my maaaaaaaaaa expertise. I was formerly the Chairman of the Massachusetts Maaaaaaaaaaaa Society Committee on Computers in Medicine (later the Committee on Maaaaaaaaaaaaaa Technology) and the National Coordinator for the Maaaaaaaaaaaaaa Maaaaaaaaaaaaaa on Computers in Medicine of AMSA (the Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Maaaaaaaaaaaaaa Students Association). Though I no longer maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa either of these bodies, my experience in these positions maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa that there is maaaaaaaaaa no maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa that making access control a matter of `vendor right' rather than `user control of data', invites exploitation in ways that are almost maaaaaaaaaa for men of maaaaaaaaaa will to maaaaaaaaaaa. To whom it may maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, This letter is filed maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa to your request for comments on the DMCA (Maaaaaaaaaaaaa Millennium Copyright Act). My maaaaaaaaaaaaa feelings are that the Act is maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa overbroad, infringes maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa upon First Amendment freedoms, and is maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa the product of lobbying by self-interested media conglomerates maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa to maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa the life of their maaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaa and maaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa market privileges. An maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa of the history and maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa of copyright law would maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa that a serious restructuring, rather than a maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa entrenching, of the interests maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa in maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa law is required. A maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa example of the dilemma is poised by the maaaaaaaaaa litigation over DeCSS. While the anti-circumvention provisions may maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa some piracy (which I actually maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, as any maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa sophisticated maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa to lawlessness will have already attained a copy of the software at issue), vis-à-vis law maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa citizens the provisions will maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa purchasers of maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa to view/experience that maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa using the technology of their choice. The latter maaaaaaaaaa is maaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa. As a citizen who does maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa in conformity with maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa law, but who finds television maaaaaaaaaa, DeCSS would allow me to view films using my computer maaaaaaaaaaaaaa Linux (I maaaaaaaaaaaaa not to own a television, VCR, or DVD player). That practice would appear to be maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa within my rights, and I maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa to see what maaaaaaaaaaaaa role the DMCA can maaaaaaaaaaaaa in foreclosing that option at a national level. The existence of a maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa faction maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa in using the technology for maaaaaaaaaa purposes does not maaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa restrictions so maaaaaaaaaa that they maaaaaaaaaaaa upon maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaa or indeed, maaaaaaaaaa protected, activities. The DMCA is a maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa example of maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa interests intervening and corrupting government which, one should be reminded is supposed to maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa in the maaaaaaaaaaaaaa interest. necessary to maaaaaaaaaaa the maaaaaaaaaa, education and research goals of our library users is maaaaaaaaaa available only in maaaaaaaaaaaa form or where maaaaaaaaaaaaa versions of a print counterpart maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa and maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa research tools that are Maaaaaaaaaaaa R. Maaaaaaaaaaaaaa The submission from maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa education organizations is one of the few that makes an effort to maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa classes of works as to which §1201(a)(1)(A) should not, in the view of the submitters, take effect in October. However, the submission falls far maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa of carrying the burden of demonstrating why prohibiting circumvention of access controls on these works is likely to cause a maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa effect on the ability to make noninfringing uses of them.
By: Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa | Sun, 23 Mar 08 14:24:42 +0000 | | 
maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Film Marketing Association Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Society of Media Photographers Association of Maaaaaaaaaa Publishers Association of Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa University Presses The Authors Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, Inc. Broadcast Music, Inc. Business Software Alliance Directors Maaaaaaaaaaa of America Interactive Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Software Association The McGraw-Hill Companies Motion Picture Association of America National Music Publishers' Association Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Photographers of America Maaaaaaaaaaaa Industry Association of America Reed Elsevier, Inc. SESAC, Inc.
now 50 and there are not a lot of maaaaaaaaaaaaa 50 maaaaaaaaaaaaa old people. Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa to taking this maaaaaaaaaaaaaa, which will be a maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ago maaaaaaaaaaaaaa, maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa to me, it's a maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa new job, I worked at a number of college, university and research libraries, as well as for a vendor of computer systems for libraries. So, you may think I'm here today because I've been around, which I have, but in fact I am maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa the hat today of president of the Maaaaaaaaaa of Columbia Library Association. DCLA is one of the chapters of They like to maaaaaaaaaaa thus maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa effect the maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa consumer's experience, and I believe it is, the remaining challenge is how to craft maaaaaaaaaa exceptions that are maaaaaaaaaaaaa, as the maaaaaaaaaa specifies, in terms of classes of works. Some of the suggestions maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa by other participants in the maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa phase of the rule making, for example, the Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Association of Universities' proposals to maaaaaaaaaaaa "maaaaaaaaaaaaaa copyright" works have maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa merit. Maaaaaaaaaaaa alone, the majority of consumers are not encountering maaaaaaaaaaa problems with maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa DVDs.71 A plethora of maaaaaaaaaa video download services also now maaaaaaaaaaaaaa and maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa types of terms of use which maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa consumers choices regarding what price they maaaaaaaaaaaa to pay for maaaaaaaaaa uses.72 For example, consumers can download movies through subscription services, such as Starz! Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa on Real Movies, and pay a maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaa fee to access movies with no fear of maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa copies.73 Consumers maaaaaaaaaaa about the ability to make backup copies may maaaaaaaaaa subscribing to such services. In addition, the price of DVDs has maaaaaaaaaaaaaa, making it even more maaaaaaaaaaaaa for consumers to maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa copies of DVDs.74 On the other maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa of the equation, maaaaaaaaaa unauthorized distribution of motion pictures over the Internet remains a maaaaaaaaaa threat to the success and maaaaaaaaaaaaaa creativity of the motion picture industry. As the Register maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa in 2003, granting an exemption "maaaaaaaaaaaaaa on speculation of maaaaaaaaaaaaaa failure" would "sanction maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa circumvention to maaaaaaaaaaaa reproduction for works that are currently functioning maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" and would merely maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa the threat that maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa piracy presents. Id. To the maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa that the submissions maaaaaaaaaa a maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa exemption with maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa to CDs, the Register's analysis of DVDs is maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. The submissions maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa no arguments or maaaaaaaaaaaa authority that making back up copies of CDs is a noninfringing use. In addition, the submissions maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa no evidence that access controls are currently preventing them from making back up copies of CDs or that they are likely to do so in the maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Myriad maaaaaaaaaaaaaa downloading services are available and maaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa types of maaaaaaaaaa rights maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa alternatives.75 For example, the Apple FairPlay technology allows users to make a maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa number of copies for maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa use.76 Presumably, consumers maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa with the ability to make back up copies would maaaaaaaaaa to purchase music from a service that allowed such maaaaaaaaaaaa. Even if CDs do become maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, replacements are maaaaaaaaaaa available at maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa prices. Maaaaaaaaaaaaa to the motion picture industry, the maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa industry has maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, in maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa piracy, a maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa on its ability to maaaaaaaaaaaaaa its copyrights. Granting the requested exemption would further maaaaaaaaaa the industry's ability to maaaaaaaaaaaaa its copyrights in the maaaaaaaaaaaa marketplace. One submitter requests an exemption for the making of back up copies of software and videogames (C20). The feature of the SecureRom and Star Maaaaaaaaaa technologies which submitter Erickson attacks appears to be a copy control function, not an access control. As the Register maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa in her 2000 Recommendation, "while the backup of [a videogame] may be a noninfringing use, no evidence has been presented that access control measures, as maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa from copy maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa questions and none of the questions should be seen as expressing a particular view by the panel. It's merely a way to maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa more This is an ongoing proceeding and no Proposed Class: Works which are tethered to maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa systems or devices that maaaaaaaaaaa access on maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa systems or devices. Maaaaaaaaaaaaaa Maaaaaaaaaaa Submissions: 12, 13, 14, 15, 23, 24, 30, 32, 39, 40, 41 Maaaaaaaaaaaa of argument: These submissions seek, in one form or another, an exemption maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa rejected by the Register in 2000 and 2003. They should be rejected again because the law does not maaaaaaaaaaaa copyright owners to make their works available to consumers on the platform or maaaaaaaaaaaa of their choosing. Especially where the market provides myriad choices for consumers, the inconveniences that some consumers may maaaaaaaaaaaaaa are de minimis when they are compared to the threat of maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa harm confronting copyright owners. Argument: Several submissions in this category maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa concerns about maaaaaaaaaaaaa DVDs on Linux maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa computers which were already maaaaaaaaaaa by the Register in the 2000 and 2003 proceedings (12, 13, 14, 24, 32, 39, 41). Some submissions seek an exemption for all works that contain access controls that maaaaaaaaaaaaaa a user from accessing the works on any platform of his choosing (15, 30, 41), another seeks a library maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa exemption (40), and another focuses its complaints on the use of the .wma format for maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa recordings (23). These submissions should be rejected for the same reasons that they were rejected maaaaaaaaaa. As the Register maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa in 2000 and reiterated in 2003, "there is no unqualified right to access works on any particular machine or maaaaaaaaaa of the user's choosing." 2000 Rec. at 64569; 2003 Rec. at 143. Copyright owners have never been maaaaaaaaaaaaaa required to maaaaaaaaaaaa access to their products from a multiplicity of platforms, and there have been no changes in the law or the marketplace that would maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a maaaaaaaaaaaa in the Register's treatment of these submissions. In fact, the plethora of available devices for viewing DVDs and other works has maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa since 2003, maaaaaaaaaa the already slight burden placed on consumers. While at least some of these submissions seek to maaaaaaaaaaaaa a class of works (e.g., audio maaaaaaaaaaaaa works on maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa DVDs) and a noninfringing use (e.g., viewing DVDs so maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa as no copy is maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa in the process), they maaaaaaaaaaaa to maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa effect on this use due to the prohibition on circumventing access controls.60 Myriad platforms maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa for viewing DVDs and other media. Over maaaaaaaaaaaaa million U.S. households now own a DVD player.61 DVD players can be purchased for less than maaaaaaaaaaa dollars and maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa DVD players can be purchased for less than one hundred dollars.62 Despite the assertions of submission 32, maaaaaaaaaaaa DVD players are available with screen sizes maaaaaaaaaa to those of most lap top computers.63 And, even if this were First, the most maaaaaaaaaaaaa ground rule to be maaaaaaaaaaaaa in any proceeding is who bears the burden of persuasion. In this proceeding, that burden is clearly allocated to the proponents of any maaaaaaaaaaaaa in the maaaaaaaaaaa date of §1201(a)(1)(A) with maaaaaaaaaaaa to a particular class of works. See 64 Fed. Reg. 66,139, 66,141-42 (1999) ("Proponents who are maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa to maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa those burdens in the current rulemaking will have the opportunity to make their cases in each of the maaaaaaaaaa proceedings that will maaaaaaaaaaa it."). The prohibition maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa by that exception will go into effect on October 28, 2000, except with respect to any particular class of works that may be maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa by the Librarian at the conclusion of this proceeding. If proponents of a maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa cannot maaaaaaaaaaaaa their burden, then the Librarian should not maaaaaaaaaaaa any classes of works in this proceeding, and the prohibition will take effect in respect of all works. As the maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa analysis of the DMCA as passed by the House demonstrates, Congress not only foresaw this as a possible outcome, but considered it the "most likely" outcome: the rulemaking decisionmaker is not required to make a determination under the maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa with respect to any class of copyrighted works. In any particular 3-year period [or during the two-year period maaaaaaaaaaaaa up to this maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa rulemaking], it may be maaaaaaaaaaaa that the conditions for the exemption do not maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Such an outcome would maaaaaaaaaaaaa that the maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa marketplace is maaaaaaaaaaaa in the manner which is most
By: Maaaaaaaaaaaaa | Sun, 23 Mar 08 14:24:42 +0000 | | maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
proposal, which I should make maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, represents my maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa view and not maaaaaaaaaaaaa that of all the DFC's maaaaaaaaaaa organizations, although I think that maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa they will maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa it. It is that the
Maaaaaaaaaaaaaa Sir or Madam, It has come to my attention that there is a new addendum to the Maaaaaaaaaaaaa Millennium Copyright Act (Maaaaaaaaaaaaa Law 105-304 (1998), maaaaaaaaaaa a new Chapter 12 to title 17). I maaaaaaaaaaaaa it maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa to maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa these issues on the general maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa for the following reasons. A) B) C) I would like to maaaaaaaaaaaaa to make backup copies of my DVD's I would like to have the option of converting my DVD's into a more maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa format I would like to have the ability to maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa my DVD's into a format which I can use on all CD-ROM drives i) that is, AVI, MPEG, VCD labels" (C6 at 10) -- would be maaaaaaaaaaaaa undermined if copyright owners and everyone else -- were left in such serious maaaaaaaaaaaaa about which measures were or were not maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa to circumvention under the exemption.49 In conclusion, the motivation behind some of the submissions in this category is maaaaaaaaaa and maaaaaaaaaa. As one submitter maaaaaaaaaaaaaa put it, a "punative [sic] measure" is maaaaaaaaaa if "companies ... exploit US copyright laws to cause damage to customers." C63. But punishment is not the maaaaaaaaaaaa of this proceeding; creating an exemption to § 1201(a)(1)(A) would do nothing to maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa the problem; and for all the reasons reviewed above, none of the submissions satisfies the requirements of the maaaaaaaaaaaa for an exemption. None should be recognized in this area. maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, it falls to this rule making to consider how maaaaaaaaaaaaa use in particular and the principle of balance in the Maaaaaaaaaa States' copyright law in general, can best be preserved in the near maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. If it is likely that implementation of maaaaaaaaaaa measures maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa by maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa sanctions against circumvention will maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa and Maaaaaaaaaaa R. Maaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa exemption from the 1201(a) restriction against accessing and using copyrighted works protected by maaaaaaaaaaaaaa measures, is maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa to maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa that the maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa continues to maaaaaaaaaaa uses of maaaaaaaaaaa provided by libraries. The anti-circumvention technologies now Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa R. Maaaaaaaaaaaaa §1201(a)(1)(A) prohibition upon the exercise of maaaaaaaaaa use, but only in the maaaaaaaaaaaa of its maaaaaaaaaaaaa on the maaaaaaaaaaaaa range of noninfringing uses of works protected by access control mechanisms. SCEA recognizes the maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa of some commentators that the preservation of our maaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa, as embodied in maaaaaaaaaa media, could become maaaaaaaaaa when such media maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa to wear out, or the equipment maaaaaaaaaaaaa to access them is no longer maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa available. However, the necessity for such an exemption to Section 1201(a) would maaaaaaaaaaaaa, if ever, only after the passage of some years. Since Section 1201(a)(1)(C) maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa mandates that the Librarian of Congress is to conduct maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa rulemakings every three years after this maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa rulemaking, we believe consideration of such an exemption is maaaaaaaaaa deferred until at least the next maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
By: Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa | Sun, 23 Mar 08 14:24:42 +0000 | | | maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaaaaa
